Showing posts with label BKMEA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BKMEA. Show all posts

Thursday, November 10, 2016

EHLatifee, BKMEA asks for extensive awareness building campaigns to hold concerning retail branding

It was my great pleasure today (10 November, 2016) being a part of Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association-BKMEA, to participate into the seminar titled "Branding for export: How to establish Retail Branding", organized by Export Promotion Bureau.


Picture 1: I, at the seminar- "Branding for export: How to establish Retail Branding".

Following the session, I conveyed my opinion mainly to build awareness among Bangladeshi entrepreneurs and industrialists by arranging special campaigns with a view to making them deeply concerned about Retail Branding, possible gains from and risks entailed with it.

I also addressed some deficiencies that do exist at policy making and decision taking level- mainly to amalgamate country branding, sectoral branding, and product branding with each other, though all of these are completely different concepts. Hence, when any policy is taken or decision is made in regards to branding, it leaves us nowhere and produces fallacious interventions.


I, just before the session ends.

Well, the situation is getting better, private stakeholders are playing excellent roles, now they are to be supported with financial and non-financial mechanisms ensuring flow of symmetric information to go for it.


Picture 2: From right-side, my BKMEA colleague, Ms. Shahanaj Begum, and session-presenter, Dr. Mohammad Abu Yusuf, Customs Specialist, USAID-BTFA Program, and me, Senior Assistant Secretary, Research and Development Cell, BKMEA.
Truly, it was an enlightening seminar that did meet my cravings to know more about present on-field situations of Bangladeshi industrialists in Retail Branding. Many many thanks to the session-presenter, Dr. Mohammad Abu Yusuf Sir, Customs Specialist, USAID-BTFA Program (please find Picture 2) for disseminating the very required information and knowledge.

And simply, bunch of thanks fly to Export Promotion Bureau for organizing such seminar.

~ #EHLatifee

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

An incredible day to recite- 24 October, 2016

An incredible day (24 October, 2016) indeed!


Caption: Campus of North South University, Bangladesh


  1. It was my great honor to meet Dr. Gour Gobinda Goswami Sir, Treasurer, North South University (NSU) today along with my fellow colleagues, Mr. Faruk Hossain, Asst. Joint Secretary, Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers & Exporters Association-BKMEA, and Mr. Ayub Ali, Sr. Asst. Secretary, BKMEA. Surely Sir, it was a very interactive meeting held in between us, more than that, we got amazed over your generosity and in-depth understandings of everything.
  2. Taking theoretical class or motivating a group of people is nothing new to me, as I was engaged into social development activism, however, it was really superb to conduct the class assigned by BKMEA to me today, at afternoon time. Dear students, I do not know, whether I can manage my time to take classes of your batch further or not, as I mostly remain busy in conducting multi-dimensional researches and representing BKMEA at various national-international forums, but I would try to take some more classes too as you requested.
  3. Again, coming to the incident of NSU, after so many years, had met my schoolmate Ishrat Kabir Annya there, and as like always, Dhaka is providing me with golden chances to meet my schoolmates at sudden, without fixing a time to. Undoubtedly, surprises make your day! Blessed we are! Just we need to count the positive things and sew those in accord.

~ #EHLatifee

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Source Tax at 0.7%: After Brexit, is it enough to cut for Bangladeshi exporters?

As a representative of Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers & Exporters Association-BKMEA, at last few weeks along with other apex associations, have advocated strongly to cut down the Source Tax on Export Earnings from proposed 1.5% to 0.6% (http://goo.gl/E8RnSC). And finally, it is appreciatory that the government has decided to lower down the Source Tax to 0.7% (http://goo.gl/d8epIH).

But, as if, for the ‪#‎Brexit‬ matter, buyers from UK, the 2nd largest export destination of Bangladesh in Europe, are now seeking discounts on Bangladeshi garments as pound falls to record low of US$ 1.35 (http://goo.gl/0ajOU9), so that it will be felt irony toward Bangladesh Ready-Made Garment (RMG) exporters, because 90% of the FY 2015-16's earned US$ 3.5 billion have fetched by this single sector from there. 

In this trembled situation, ‪#‎Bangladesh‬ Government should rethink freshly to withdraw entire Source Tax, thus to cut down Source Tax completely to 0% in case of exporting RMG to Europe only, with a view to checkmating the Pound Sterling- Euro Exchange Rate turmoils and compensating the loss in earnings that would held Bangladesh economy healthy. Otherwise, it is going to cause a huge loss in foreign currency earnings from the Europe again, for sure.

Friday, April 8, 2016

3 Recommendations: Bangladesh National Budget FY 2016-17


It was my pleasure to be present at the 'Pre-budget Meeting with the Prominent Economists' being a delegate of Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers & Exporters Association-BKMEA hosted by National Board of Revenue, Bangladesh (NBR) on 27 March, 2016 addressing FY 2016-17 Budget and coined Revenue Collection target and process.
Well, I placed 3 recommendations at the meeting which are expressed here-below,


  1. It will be better if the present 1.1 million (i.e., regular and irregular) tax payers are not overburdened with high tax rates but as if there are 8 million economic units existing in Bangladesh and this mesoeconomic class is resilient, therefore NBR can easily go for widening this existing total number of tax payers near to 8 million by awareness building consecutive programs, this will help national revenue to whoop easily at the targeted level.
  2. As a whole, Bangladesh RMG Industry-BRMGI (e.g., mainly the woven sector) does 30%-35% value addition within the country, it means this industry imports 65%-70% raw materials from outside the country and it is taxed then, so when the final Ready-made Garments are exported then the Source Tax on entire Export Price should not be imposed rather it should be imposed on the value of Cutting and Making, because this is actual earnings.
  3. When BRMGI uses domestic yarns-fabrics then it gets 5% financial incentive, but on this amount later, 37.50% tax is imposed, hence, taxes on these kinds of financial incentives should be removed completely to assist BRMGI for reaching the Vision 2021 of present government.


Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Dinner in honour of Latin American Ambassador/ High Commissioner/ CDA: Acclimatizing to RMG export boost

Enamul Hafiz Latifee writes,

It was a very efficient and reciprocally close Dinner Time at Pan Pacific Sonargaon Dhaka on 7 March, 2016, with Honourable Latin American Ambassadors (i.e., Dominican Republic, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela), High Commissioner of Guyana to Bangladesh, ChargĂ© d’ Affaires of Trinidad and Tobago to Bangladesh and Ministry of ‪#‎Foreign‬ Affairs, Bangladesh.

Photo: A random moment while I was engaged with anchoring the program.

However, it was really a pleasant experience to anchor the programme and side by side expressing my research experiences with distinguished guests related to the domestic RMG market size and local retail branding of Bangladesh; special gratitude goes to my senior colleague Mr. Faruk Hossain for providing me this situation-demanded opportunity. Well, I would like to be thankful enough to the Board of Directors of Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers & Exporters Association-BKMEA too for taking progressive initiatives always.


Photo: I (1st from the right-hand side), with H.E. Mr. Augusto Montiel, Ambassador-designate of Venezuela to Bangladesh (standing at the 3rd, from left-hand side)


Nonetheless, I would like to convey my special thanks to my colleagues- Mr. Pallab Bhattacherja, Mr. Rashedul Kabir Shimul, Mr. Mahfuz Khan, Mr. Razib Huda and all other (i..e, who are not in my FB account) for making this event really happen.

Photo: Post-dinner photo session with Latin American honourable diplomats, officials of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangladesh, Board of Directors and Secretaries, BKMEA.

Last but not the least, I really loved to meet my senior ‪#‎SUSTian‬ brother. Mr. Tanvir Ahmad Jummon (Assistant Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangladesh) face-to-face for the first time.
Alhamdulillah, hope to see a boost in Bangladesh export soon! 

wink emoticon

Sunday, January 17, 2016

NYU's “Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg” makes deceitful statements about Bangladesh RMG Industry (BRMGI)

Bangladesh RMG Industry (BRMGI) is completely export-oriented one and comprises very deep multidimensional impacts on country’s moving economy. Hence, this strategic sector’s foreign currency earnings accounts for 81.70 per cent of total export earnings of Bangladesh during the fiscal year (FY) 2015 which in monetary term amounted US$ 25.49 billion. Moreover at the same time, Knitwear Sector earnings from export amounted US$ 13.26 billion which holds 49.13 per cent export earning share of total RMG earnings indicating this sector’s competitiveness and classy presence in the world market of homogenous kind.
This write-up intends to reveal how the NYU’s research titled “Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Bangladesh’s Forgotten Apparel Workers” went wrong on the pre-assumed biased hypothesis, which are as follows,

1.     Bangladesh itself has a very big domestic market for clothing which is dominantly met by domestic ‘Clothes Tailoring Industry (CTI)’ and ‘Bangladeshi Local Retail Brands (BLRB)’: 

     NYU’s study completely subsided this fact and failed to understand that Bangladesh itself is market for around 160 million people[1] and naturally occupies a very high aggregated demand for ready-made clothing. Bangladesh imports a little from abroad still now, despite it has recently reached at the status of ‘lower-middle income class.[2]’ The relevant data is given below (See Table 1),


Table 1: Import expenditure of Bangladesh on HS-Code 61 and 62; Data Source: ITC Trade map, 2016.
Product code
Product label
Value in 2012
(‘000 US$)
Value in 2013
(‘000 US$)
Value in 2014
(‘000 US$)
'61
Articles of apparel, accessories, knit or crochet
92866
185636
119911
'62
Articles of apparel, accessories, not knit or crochet
116684
150987
202772

According to UNICEF, Bangladesh has almost 100 million people[3] who are above 18 years of age and 52.75 per cent[4] of this population is male indicating that total male citizen of Bangladesh is approximately 57.25 million (note: calculated by the author, E. H. Latifee, 2016 based on the data collected), now with this reference if we find out the per-head import-expenditure on HS-Code 61 and 62 respectively, we find the situation as revealed in the Table 2 below,

Table 2: Per-head (Male) yearly import expenditure on Knit and Woven RMG made for males. Data Calculation: E. H. Latifee, 2016 by using Table 1 and population info expressed above.
Product code
Product label
Per-head Value in 2012
Per-head Value in 2013
Per-head Value in 2014
'61
Articles of apparel, accessories, knit or crochet
1.760492891
3.519165877
2.273194313
'62
Articles of apparel, accessories, not knit or crochet
2.212018957
2.862312796
3.844018957

From the Table 2 it is very clear that at the Calendar Year 2014, for Bangladeshi male, import expenditure of HS Code 61 and 62 were only US$ 2.27 and US$ 3.84, whether the HS Code 61’s manufacturing price is around US$ 3.19 and HS Code 62’s is US$ 5 per unit of production on average- it rationalizes that Bangladesh still does not import Knit or Woven clothes from abroad at large scale indicating that ‘Clothes Tailoring Industry (CTI)’ of Bangladesh and ‘Bangladeshi Local Retail Brands (BLRB)’ fill up the huge domestic demand for RMG.


2.     The photos that NYU Stern’s study used was from Keraniganj, where only domestic demand filling ‘Clothes Tailoring Industry (CTI)’ related businesses are present but no export-oriented factory is there and by showing those pictures the study tried to showcase fallaciously that export-oriented Bangladesh RMG Industry (BRMGI) is also like that:

One of the pictures (See Photo 1) that NYU Sterns study used taken from Keraniganj which is concentrated business area for Clothing Tailoring Industry (CTI) meeting only domestic demand is completely different from and have no association with export oriented Bangladesh RMG Industry.

Photo 1: Comparative scenario of local CTI and BRMGI; Source: Left one- from BKMEA recent photo collecting activities and the right one- from NYU’s paper.


BKMEA monitors environmental, productivity and quality, fire and electrical, structural and labour health-wage, workplace elated matters of its’ member factories time to time, still it has not found any factory having the scenario that NYU’s photo depicted, rather NYU’s research took it from Keraniganj which place is used by CTI business only to meet domestic demand for ready-made clothing but not associated with export at any level.


3.     ‘Clothes Tailoring Industry (CTI)’ of Bangladesh and ‘Bangladeshi Local Retail Brands (BLRB)’ get knowledge about new fashion trend either collecting photos from internet or by observing consumers’ preferences through their set up shops:

Perhaps, NYU Stern research team got confused by seeing look-alike RMG products at those CTI factories situated in Keraniganj which are actually inferior in quality and there are defects on those products, but later they amalgamated those products falsely with export-quality products. But the reality is, CTI does not have the technological advancements to meet the buyers’ demand for RMG-product perfectly with the quality a world-class brand needs. Rather, BLRB sometimes fetch quality fabrics from abroad and provides design and fabric to CTI for stitching it, and local customers cannot catch the difference in stitching with normal eye-view. Sometimes it happens, CTI readies shirts or T-shirts which look-alike export-oriented RMGs but they source fabric from very cheap sources and those fabric fail to qualify international standard even, but as if those are cheap, that is why local Bangladeshi low-medium earning people buy those.
Moreover, if BRMGI coined export oriented factory’s production gets rejected from buyers then they sell it to the local wholesalers as there is a provision in National Industrial Policy 2010 for 100 per cent export oriented industry stating that they can sell 20 per cent of their manufactured products by paying due taxes and duties- this also work as a way for CTI and BLRB to copy export-quality RMG designs and by modifying those a bit, later they produces RMGs for meeting local demands only.


4.     In applicable cases, subcontracting is prefixed by the buyers expressed in the LC opened and no manufacturer and exporter can violate it as there are auditing teams to monitor at different steps:

 Subcontracting is a usual process in world businesses and can be done by any firm with other firm being under laws and regulations[5], and by satisfying contracts made with buyers. However, firstly, BRMGI businesses usually do not subcontract as if they have capacity to meet buyers’ quantity demanded, but depending on the orders they scale down their productivity sometimes and excel up productivity further when orders come frequently. And secondly, if even subcontracting is needed, then RMG manufacturers and exporters are given with set of conditions from the end of buyers expressing with which factories they can go for subcontracting and what standards the subcontracted factories should be meeting for must. These two-fold premises reject the core hypothesis that NYU Stern’s study drew that BRMGI subcontracts with CTI who are not directly connected to export.
Hence, the research publication titled “Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Bangladesh’s Forgotten Apparel Workers”, published by NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights may have good intentions to protect the labour rights but had conducted the research activities under above mentioned title by pre-assuming that labourers of this phenomenal industry is in very pity-risky condition which is completely invalid that is illustrated here briefly, however the biased stance of that study led to a fallacious concluding remarks full of false linking and fatal contradictions with the reality existing here within. Despite these, Bangladesh RMG Industry eyes on achieving US$ 50 billion target by 2021 which is one of the visionary heartfelt attainable goals of present dynamic government to reach at.

The writer, Enamul Hafiz Latifee, Senior Assistant Secretary, Research and Development (R&D) Cell, Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA).